One of the most widespread ways to combat global warming is to pay carbon emissions and CO2 emissions to carbon leakage technologies. More trees are planted with the money collected, often a noteworthy solution whose effectiveness still needs to be proven
How much would such an approach be per tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions? What would it have on the global economy? The figures are slowly developing
The report issued by the United Nations in May 2007 suggests that global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as in the case of carbon dioxide, will have a global emissions of 3% by 2030 for world economies by 2030, 3% lower than what would otherwise be the result of the costs of CO2 reduction programs
The World Resources Institute, the Washington DC Environmental Think Tank, to bring carbon levels to the level recommended by the UN report, Between $ 20 and $ 100 per tonne of carbon dioxide.
McKinsey & Co.'s energy company estimates $ 40 per tonne of CO2 to reach the 2030th greenhouse gas level
proposed by the UN in 1966, where "carbon trading" became a new "derivative trade" specialty, a ton of CO2 will go for $ 25 for May 2007. That would cost you to release tons of carbon dioxide next year.
Prince Charles of Charlotte Energy Corp. uses the "$ 7.50 to $ 30 per tonne" in the following investment plans. Robert S. Socolow, professor at Princeton University, quoted by the Wall Street Journal as saying that a carbon deduction that could produce 30 tonnes of CO2 emissions per tonne, US consumers will pay another 30 cents a gallon gas pumps
Thus, estimates are still between $ 20 and $ 100 per ton of carbon dioxide released so there are plenty of room for policy-makers and economists to create ever-changing alternative plans while providing a lot of justification for scummy consumers scratching his head.
In the current situation, not only science and politics, but economics of global warming seem equally complicated
Source by sbobet