I hear a lot about quality costs and the impact on production in such a negative sense. I was thinking it's time to throw away the myth to invest in quality negative impacts.  Quantitative costs are not defined in the creation, introduction and support of the quality assurance system, as most think. This is rather the cost of accepting the program. How much does it cost to lose the contract for low quality? What does this do to your credibility? How does it affect the bottom line of being unable to acquire more customers and make more deals? The actions are much louder than the words, as well as the end result.
So how much does it cost?
We know that poor quality of the cost of the average business activity of 15 to 30% of the service was not the first place. So what about 15-30%? Recycling, return and big dollar. Worth to consider is the low quality of 15 or 30% loss? I'm sure everyone will find something better to spend this money.
So how much does a quality program cost? The exact bladder rule suggests that a quality problem costing $ 100 to settle in the field would only cost $ 10 for repair if discovered during the design review and was only $ 1 to block it first. Certainly your reputation and the bottom line are worth a dollar. There are four basic areas you need to improve cost performance: Prevention, Check or Evaluation, Internal Error, and Terrified External Error Rate. It represents about one quarter of a double discount.
Investing in the best machines, picking the industry's brightest and smartest programmers to work on Think it's the best product or service around. I know you believe it or you will not get up every morning to go to work. With your commitment, hard work and effort, your investments are now depreciated per hour and have been used for errors. It's a vicious circle that feeds itself, the harder it is to do, the more it pushes, the deeper it gets. Would you like to reimburse this investment? The quality programs really appreciate the time. Your initial dollar is two dollars a year.
In summary, it's good to say that due to poor quality programs, there are a number of shortcomings recently. Did Mattel apply quality standards to their contract with the company responsible for the death of high-level children's children? Imagine if Topps performed better checks on beef and internal process control, but can still do business in court instead of bankruptcy. Low quality costs are high on many levels. It's worth one dollar.
Source by sbobet